Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-D3H (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140108
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '16 at 14:58
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135 7,219 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 83.5 1-Core 71.6 2-Core 93.7 55% 82.9 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 207 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 8A9B) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 23.4 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 20.8 19% 20.6 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 17.7 17% 21 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 150GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 692 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 83 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 67 20 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 91 91 8933 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2117778886	70.7% Very good	Read 509 Write 25.5 Mixed 188 52% 241 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 37.9 135% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 96.1 DQ Mixed 65.6 73% 127 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1060 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 319 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 58 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 42 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13907268694	89.1% Excellent	Read 506 Write 390 Mixed 412 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 30.6 124% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 78.4 83% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 319GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 66 204501481 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 25 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 1850852 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 81 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 23 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 80 69 370081812 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 27 (C2) HDA temperature 20 13 55834574868 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 3 1 204501481 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 19615115640911 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1355441786 (F2) Unknown 100 253 451436014	78.8% Very good	Read 141 Write 134 Mixed 127 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.31 89% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 992100 (99710 992100 (99710 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 11.8 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88X-D3H Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-D3H - $120

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	26x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	23x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	12x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 3,080 samples	11x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 4,885 samples	10x
F3 DDR3 2133 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 38%, 541 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $326

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16