Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '18 at 22:09
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 838 75% 633 Pts	64-Core 1,178 73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Lighting 48.1 Reflection 44.9 Parallax 39.9 39% 44.3 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 41 Splatting 36.3 32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 960 250GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 178 192 188 186 187 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 659 Write 1,470 Mixed 529 SusWrite 188 161% 711 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 37.3 152% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 625 DQ Mixed 376 312% 437 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 223%
Amd-raid Array 1 319GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 163GB free Firmware: 9.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 165 194 189 188 188 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 310 Write 222 Mixed 211 SusWrite 184 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 17.9 65% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 81.7 72% 107 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 66%
Amd-raid MTFDBAK128MAG-1G 128GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 11GB free Firmware: 0005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 91 86 84 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 235 Write 127 Mixed 158 SusWrite 84.8 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 11.5 65% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 60.8 DQ Write 79.3 DQ Mixed 56.3 46% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 38%
Amd-raid LITEONIT LCT-128 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 119GB free Firmware: VQDC SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 139 163 160 154 161 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.1% Above average	Read 390 Write 193 Mixed 217 SusWrite 155 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 21.5 77% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 98.3 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 102 88% 128 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 67%
Amd-raid WDC WD6400AAKS-6 640GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 153GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 51 60 59 58 58 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 99 Write 64.7 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 57.2 49% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 60%
Amd-raid WDC WD5000AAKX-7 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 45GB free Firmware: 19.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 56 62 62 61 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 66.2 Write 56.2 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 61.2 41% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 68%
Amd-raid WDC WD5000BPKT-7 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 92GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 50 56 53 53 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 69.2 Write 62 Mixed 38 SusWrite 53.4 41% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 28.8 90% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 24.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,066

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)