Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Killer/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	23.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160809
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 07:54
Run Duration	1609 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 114 2-Core 234 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 693 66% 549 Pts	64-Core 859 53% 859 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Lighting 189 Reflection 175 Parallax 183 154% 182 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 162 Splatting 116 106% 130 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154 14,088 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 336 225 223 142 186 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 827 Write 479 Mixed 410 SusWrite 234 108% 487 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 93.9 4K Mixed 27.7 136% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 662 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 444 347% 486 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 155%
Plextor PX-512M7VC 512GB 300 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 44GB free Firmware: 1.05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 245 187 190 167 186 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 452 Write 411 Mixed 354 SusWrite 229 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 35.9 129% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 283 226% 319 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 105%
Galaxy GX0500MT100 512GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2GB free Firmware: 1.00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 448 Write 411 Mixed 313 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 85.1 4K Mixed 38.9 134% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 225 188% 271 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 97%
Lacie Rugged FW USB3 1TB 385 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 189GB free Firmware: 051E SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 84 85 84 84 85 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 55 Write 35 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 81.4 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 59%
Seagate ST4000NM0035-1V4107 4TB 1,942 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 221GB free Firmware: TN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 144 174 150 174 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 119 Write 116 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 168 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 115%
Lacie Rugged FW USB3 1TB 385 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 86GB free Firmware: 051E SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 60 62 61 60 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 51.5 Write 28.7 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 58.9 30% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 124% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 59%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB 678 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 40 42 39 41 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 36 Write 20.5 Mixed 33 SusWrite 36.3 23% 31.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 194% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 69%
Unitek ASM1153E 1TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 469GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 111 111 109 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 114 Write 104 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 111 65% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905625-074.A00G 4x16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 49.7 MC Mixed 39.4 121% 42.2 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 18.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	24x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	14x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	11x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	10x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x
NVME SSD 256GBNetacBench 178%, 1,034 samples	4x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 4x4GBKingstonBench 91%, 1,174 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16