Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 02:30
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$232
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 758
83% 658 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 117
Parallax 98.8
91% 109 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 102
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,028
Write 1,292
Mixed 505
279% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 57
213% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 881
DQ Mixed 628
555% 834 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
368GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 78 78 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 76.9
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
367GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 89 88 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 98
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 87.9
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
288GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 112 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 168
Write 130
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 113
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
128GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 92 92 90 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 110
Write 102
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 90.6
59% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
101GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 46.8
Write 47.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 47.9
37% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 67%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1.5TB
141GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 78.7
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 108
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Sabrent Disk Dev 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 109 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 82.5
Write 114
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 108
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
329% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.6% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 20.5
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback