Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 04:06
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 134
57% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 276
31% 243 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
EVGA(3842 6332) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 18.2
16% 17.5 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 20
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 58 62 59 65 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 146
Write 112
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 63.5
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 25.9
83% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 67.2
DQ Write 97.9
DQ Mixed 91.4
67% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 73%
Toshiba MK1652GSX 160GB-$30
21GB free
Firmware: LV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 50 49 50 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 47.7
Mixed 30
SusWrite 50
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 34%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
209GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 218 217 195 118 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 176
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 181
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
253GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 76 74 76 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46% Average
Read 85.5
Write 86.3
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 74.7
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$33
79GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 77 75 77 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 76.2
Write 75
Mixed 54
SusWrite 75.9
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
374GB free
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 110 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 109
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.1 8 7.2 8.4 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.46% Terrible
Read 30.2
Write 12.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 7.2
16% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
22GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 5.5 3.7 3.7 4.5 3.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 30
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.2
11% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 2.4
204% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 64GB
43GB free, PID 5599
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 8.6 10 12 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 5
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 10.8
19% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.2
133% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 64GB
59GB free, PID 5599
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.6 11 10 9.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 12.2
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 10.1
21% 18 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.1
112% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G HP497157-C01-ELDW HP497157-C01-ELDW HP497157-C01-ELDW 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.4% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.3
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback