Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 970A-G/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160112
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '18 at 03:05
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$65 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 114 57% 88.5 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 303 30% 248 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Lighting 49.9 Reflection 34.6 Parallax 42 41% 42.2 fps	MRender 42.6 Gravity 46.7 Splatting 41.1 35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 140 136 130 129 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 288 Write 352 Mixed 271 SusWrite 146 60% 264 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 32.2 102% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 63.1 DQ Mixed 42.2 34% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 124%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB 4,692 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 375GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.3% Very poor	Read 40.8 Write 32.8 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 31.6 8% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 11.8 40% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 24.2 DQ Mixed 27.3 20% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 555GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 117 116 117 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	74% Very good	Read 142 Write 120 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 116 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 489GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 132 132 132 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 154 Write 134 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 131 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 114%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 73GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 77 77 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 69.5 Write 60.2 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 76 46% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 62%
WDC WD20 03FYYS-70W0B0 2TB 408GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 34 33 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.8% Poor	Read 128 Write 32.8 Mixed 44 SusWrite 32.9 65% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 48% 0.8 MB/s

ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 34 34 34 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 140 Write 112 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 33.8 114% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.3% Average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 12.4 28% 10 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

CPU
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	115x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	113x
FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $99Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	4x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 27%, 2,515 samples	34x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 9,944 samples	20x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400