HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory44.8 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 01 '19 at 20:04
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 577
57% 463 Pts
64-Core 1,304
81% 1,304 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 30.5
23% 29.8 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 28
Splatting 27.5
22% 27.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23%
Great: 22%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 179
Parallax 177
122% 168 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 171
Splatting 115
109% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 479GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 574 533 586 576 592 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 551
Write 477
Mixed 354
SusWrite 577
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 20.3
70% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 266
201% 269 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 316%
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB
103GB free
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 691 689 696 692 696 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,167
Write 409
Mixed 492
SusWrite 694
153% 690 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 39.4
132% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 570
412% 540 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 153%
Great: 247%
Seagate ST3146356SS 147GB
105GB free
Firmware: HS10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 168 168 167 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 147
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 168
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.5
284% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
609GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 114
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 82%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 800GB
745GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 139 138 139 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.4% Very good
Read 137
Write 25.5
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 139
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.3
264% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 6.1 5.9 2.2 0.4 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
6.86% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 11.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.5
14% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:8... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback