Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 92.3 2-Core 187 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 484 48% 392 Pts	64-Core 482 30% 482 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 8587) 2GB CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Lighting 24.3 Reflection 18.6 Parallax 21.8 20% 21.6 fps	MRender 27.3 Gravity 24.3 Splatting 18.5 19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MAY-1A 512GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: M504 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 234 244 247 247 247 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.1% Very good	Read 253 Write 247 Mixed 218 SusWrite 242 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 37.6 130% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 133 106% 148 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 614GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 180 186 184 187 187 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 89.5 Write 137 Mixed 75 SusWrite 185 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 113%
Hitachi HMS5C4040AL 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 737GB free Firmware: A580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 85 84 87 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 73.5 Write 84.7 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 85.8 48% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 4x4GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 31 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16