Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateJan 08 '19 at 16:35
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 77.3
45% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 294
26% 220 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31240GN 240GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 100 83 50 48 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
4GB free
Firmware: AX00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95
Write 93.7
Mixed 34.8
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
Toshiba HDWJ105 500GB
4GB free
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 57 66 61 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 91.3
Write 57
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 63.9
42% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
9GB free
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 64 62 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 64
Write 61.8
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 62.6
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
67GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 25 25 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 74
Write 77
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 26.5
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
4GB free, PID 3321
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 30.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 11.1
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
83GB free, PID 3323
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 29.3
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 10.7
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
143% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
11GB free, PID 3323
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 50 46 48 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 16.3
Write 53
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 49.1
59% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
5GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 54.8
120% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1GB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.5 3.8 4.2 5.5 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 9
Write 8
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 4.5
9% 7.18 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
165% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
7GB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 30.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 10.8
31% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
13GB free, PID 3321
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 30 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 11.8
Write 18.5
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 30.5
31% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 15.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback