Supermicro X10DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X10DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAI
Memory117 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161109
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 17:53
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 726
64% 544 Pts
64-Core 2,441
151% 2,441 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 188
Parallax 169
129% 172 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 173
Splatting 121
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.8% Very good
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 106
Parallax 94.8
81% 100 fps
MRender 85.9
Gravity 94
Splatting 84.5
72% 88.1 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM480 480GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 229 229 218 211 220 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 444
Write 405
Mixed 300
SusWrite 218
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 38.6
139% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 281
227% 321 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
209GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 257 258 249 242 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 428
Mixed 405
SusWrite 243
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 54.3
178% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 354
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Areca ARC-1882-VOL#000 32TB
153GB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 370 366 405 432 391 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate BUP SL 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 18 19 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Read 122
Write 19.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 18.3
10% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
2% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 13%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234
332GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 1258 1259 1255 1255 1256 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,347
Write 2,099
Mixed 1,386
SusWrite 1,222
394% 1,764 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 69.4
241% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,127
DQ Write 804
DQ Mixed 947
712% 960 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 286%
Great: 371%
Toshiba MG07ACA1 14TB
24TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 399 402 396 387 420 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 58.7
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 47.4
143% 50 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DAi Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X10DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $211
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback