Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '19 at 12:51
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 70.5 1-Core 130 2-Core 249 81% 150 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 860 82% 677 Pts	64-Core 1,315 81% 1,315 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Lighting 81.3 Reflection 81 Parallax 69.6 66% 77.3 fps	MRender 73.2 Gravity 75 Splatting 76 61% 74.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 64GB-$57 207 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN059 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 72 76 80 74 MB/s Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.7% Above average	Read 267 Write 82.3 Mixed 109 SusWrite 74.2 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 33.9 120% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 84.1 DQ Mixed 78.6 69% 105 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 64%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 7GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 50 37 52 58 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 361 Write 57 Mixed 126 SusWrite 45.5 32% 147 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 38.5 145% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 67.7 DQ Mixed 92.2 86% 138 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 124%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 42GB free Firmware: V8X01c45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 283 295 286 279 177 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 352 Write 318 Mixed 292 SusWrite 268 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 33.7 119% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 189 141% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 950GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 152 138 100 175 183 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 164 Mixed 84 SusWrite 151 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 610GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 49 49 50 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 106 Write 99 Mixed 103 SusWrite 49.9 67% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 180GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 112 Write 36.7 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 37.7 42% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 76%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2TB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 178 180 179 180 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 198 Write 177 Mixed 86.3 SusWrite 178 210% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 17,029 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.5% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 12.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 9.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)