MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A32
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180307
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '19 at 02:12
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 175 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 648 60% 499 Pts	64-Core 890 55% 890 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8436) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.73% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 3.47 4% 4.17 fps	MRender 6.48 Gravity 4.87 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.73% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,960 Write 1,420 Mixed 580 290% 1,320 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 49.6 186% 68.4 MB/s	DQ Read 945 DQ Write 651 DQ Mixed 609 506% 735 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 223GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 41 36 36 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 36.9 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 36.5 24% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 84%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 260GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 52 47 47 44 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 42.2 Write 40.1 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 47 34% 44.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 63%
USB 3.0 1TB 599 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 33GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 14 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 21.8 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 13.4 19% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 100%
Asmedia ASM1153E 1TB 248 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 692GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 35 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 14.9 22% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 99%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 789GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 11 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 27.5 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 11.8 32% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 2,309 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	98% Outstanding	MC Read 38.9 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 35.3 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.4 SC Write 33.2 SC Mixed 27.2 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	250x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	225x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	181x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	174x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	121x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	53x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $904

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16