Asus StrikerExtreme

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus StrikerExtreme (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '19 at 11:46
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44 6,294 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 38 2-Core 75.7 45% 65.6 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 140 20% 145 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 40.7 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 38.8 33% 37.2 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 40.3 Splatting 38.3 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 37 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.4% Very poor	Read 135 Write 39 Mixed 43.3 SusWrite 37.1 14% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 3.5 27% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 465GB free Firmware: 12.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 81 81 81 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	47% Average	Read 82.5 Write 79 Mixed 54 SusWrite 80.7 54% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 69%
WD My Book ES 640GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 396GB free Firmware: 012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 73 58 59 68 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 80.8 Write 33.7 Mixed 46 SusWrite 59.7 41% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 4.8 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical StrikerExtreme Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus StrikerExtreme

CPU
Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 8800 UltraNvidiaBench 6%, 122 samples	3x
GTX 570Nvidia $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples	2x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

SSD
0 480GBCt480bx5Bench 58%, 896 samples	2x
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	1x
50 1TBCt1000mxBench 88%, 2,171 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	4x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $57

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16