Today's hottest deals

MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7883
MotherboardMSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 01:50
Run Duration367 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 694
69% 562 Pts
64-Core 882
55% 882 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 152
Parallax 141
104% 140 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 144
Splatting 115
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 248 240 229 239 234 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 454
Mixed 371
SusWrite 240
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 49.4
166% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 248
214% 315 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 126%
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB-$210
446GB free
Firmware: SAFC02.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 182 188 190 190 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 487
Write 479
Mixed 338
SusWrite 188
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 37.6
140% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 182
181% 290 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 116%
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB-$210
446GB free
Firmware: SAFC01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 182 188 190 190 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 462
Mixed 364
SusWrite 188
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 39.7
145% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 204
191% 296 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91%
Great: 116%
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB-$210
446GB free
Firmware: SAFC01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 182 188 190 190 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 470
Mixed 373
SusWrite 188
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 39.1
147% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 200
183% 280 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 116%
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB-$210
446GB free
Firmware: SAFC01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 251 258 260 264 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 469
Mixed 368
SusWrite 258
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 38.5
142% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 200
184% 281 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 116%
Seagate 600 480GB-$199
123GB free
Firmware: C675
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 381 382 376 375 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 428
Mixed 343
SusWrite 379
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 34.3
124% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 251
211% 306 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 104%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
326GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 391 391 385 384 369 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 461
Mixed 407
SusWrite 388
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 52.2
177% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 357
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 178 177 178 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 140
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 178
88% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.9
344% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 194 195 192 189 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 166
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 193
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
350% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 110%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.5 0.2 1 1.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 100
Write 107
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 0.6
93% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 126 128 129 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 127
163% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 57%
ST330006 51NS 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 129 129 127 130 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 150
Write 137
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 126
160% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%
ST330006 51NS 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1.2 0.8 1.9 1.7 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 3
102% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown + + 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 34.2
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883) Builds (Compare 250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback