Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '19 at 03:17
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 75.2 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 82% 151 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 732 74% 602 Pts	64-Core 1,257 78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.3% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 110 Parallax 100 84% 105 fps	MRender 92.5 Gravity 94.9 Splatting 97.2 78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 435 417 418 450 418 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 451 Mixed 324 SusWrite 426 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 41.8 150% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 160 169% 282 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 116%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 61GB free Firmware: 010G SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 172 143 135 143 142 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 440 Write 248 Mixed 262 SusWrite 165 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 89.2 4K Mixed 14.5 97% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 23.1 43% 84.8 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 74%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 173GB free Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 302 289 285 303 282 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 339 Write 303 Mixed 222 SusWrite 292 65% 289 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 14 96% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 73.4 84% 143 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 9TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 189 189 184 196 188 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 201 Write 201 Mixed 117 SusWrite 190 238% 177 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1 208% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 95%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 40 37 41 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 94.7 Write 73.7 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 38.3 84% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 83% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 71%
WDC WD20 EARS-00J2GB0 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 238GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 21 22 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.44% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 27.7 Mixed 30 SusWrite 21.2 35% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.44% Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 270GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 84 Write 104 Mixed 52 SusWrite 0.2 76% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 131GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 44.3 Write 39 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 2 36% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.9% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 23.4 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 19.7 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)