Asrock H61M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110831
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 17:31
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 187
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 363
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
PwrHis(1787 2290) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 20.8
0% 11.4 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 17
13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 44 26 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.2% Very poor
Read 83.9
Write 30.4
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 35.2
8% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 5.3
30% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
334GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 173 172 176 177 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
488GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.8 9.6 9.7 9.3 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 8.7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 9.7
18% 16 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 20%
Intenso Alu Line 64GB
56GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 3.6 4.1 4.1 3.9 3.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 5
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 4
10% 7.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-HVS Builds (Compare 519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVS - $64

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $389
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback