Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 05:12
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 127
53% 88.2 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 349
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8461) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 8
6% 7.35 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.26
5% 6.46 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 411
Write 376
Mixed 322
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 35.6
108% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 196
148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
504GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.6
Write 70.5
Mixed 43.7
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
228GB free
Firmware: CC37
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 77.6
Write 77.5
Mixed 51.3
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
OWC Elite Pro U3FW 2TB
964GB free, PID a2a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 177 177 175 178 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 171
Write 172
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 170
191% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
29GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.1
Write 25.2
Mixed 30.9
38% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.1
53% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback