Today's hottest deals

Medion MS-7848

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion MS-7848  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130923
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 22:32
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 90%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 181
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 300
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
Lighting 79
Reflection 78.6
Parallax 75.1
64% 77.5 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 76.4
61% 74.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$200
809GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 440 418 380 379 374 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 317
Write 469
Mixed 367
SusWrite 396
88% 387 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 37.6
130% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 344
258% 344 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 105%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
208GB free
Firmware: 3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 37
SusWrite 95.4
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 57%
ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB
92GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 184
Write 153
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 1.5
130% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
493GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 86 93 92 93 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 89.1
136% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 47%
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB
506GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 113
Write 117
Mixed 70
SusWrite 2.1
94% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
291% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 67%
WDC WD20 EARS-22MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 93 92 93 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 102
Write 116
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 90.3
116% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
495GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 0.9 0.3 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 174
Write 143
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 1.9
102% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31%
Great: 67%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB
37GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0 0 0.1 0.2 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 92.4
Write 95.1
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 16.9
77% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7848 Builds (Compare 718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7848

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback