Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 085M2V
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 23:52
Run Duration498 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 38.8
1-Core 14.7
2-Core 23.1
19% 25.5 Pts
4-Core 28.7
8-Core 35.3
4% 32 Pts
64-Core 29.1
2% 29.1 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 2.4
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 84 124 62 79 78 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.8% Very poor
Read 118
Write 88.1
Mixed 106
SusWrite 83.7
22% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 4.9
16% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 129%
SABRENT 1TB
91GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.7
Write 65
Mixed 34.8
35% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 90%
SABRENT 1TB
163GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.8
Write 37.6
Mixed 31.8
24% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.3
103% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 90%
General USB Flash Disk 126GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.6
Write 19.1
Mixed 25.5
30% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 87%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 76.8
120% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 74%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.9
Write 102
Mixed 67.6
111% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 74%
ST2000DM 008-2FR102 2TB
30GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 10 13 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 52.3
Write 76.3
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 12.2
65% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 73%
WDC WD20 EARS-22MVWB0 2TB
98GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.5 5.8 10 8 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.08% Terrible
Read 40.7
Write 49.6
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 8.4
38% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 36%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 22 22 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 71.1
Write 113
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 22.2
96% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24%
Great: 73%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
194GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 23 22 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 48.9
Write 74.6
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 21.8
69% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.3
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 73%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
61GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 22 22 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 51.7
Write 68.3
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 22
63% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 58%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
108GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 22 22 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 73.4
Write 79.6
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 21.9
78% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback