Toshiba ST-7000/M-7000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba ST-7000/M-7000 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWB-852GME-ENGINE
Memory	1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20051212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '17 at 00:16
Run Duration	405 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2.00GHz 9 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Memory 37.4 1-Core 23.2 2-Core 21.1 20% 27.2 Pts	4-Core 22.8 8-Core 23.7 3% 23.2 Pts	64-Core 23.3 1% 23.3 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 107GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 91GB free Firmware: 1.0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	6.22% Terrible	Read 11.1 Write 10 Mixed 10.5 8% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.49 96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.22% Great: 91%
Toshiba MK4032GAX 40GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: AD101A Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1137 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 803 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 22 22 31468 (0A) Spinup retry count 116 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 556 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 90 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1541696 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 188979281951 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 10 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 211 (DE) Loaded hours 69 69 12769 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 364 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	13.8% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 25.2 Mixed 20.7 17% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.15 41% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 15%
USB2.0 FlashDisk 4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.05% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 4.97 Mixed 6.29 9% 8.82 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.01 12% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.05% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.84% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 1.9 6% 2 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 1.97 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.84% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba ST-7000/M-7000

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)