Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 12:47
Run Duration349 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 252
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 980
88% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,339
83% 1,339 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38.2
37% 38.3 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 37.1
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 653 657 662 663 659 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,526
Write 2374
Mixed 1629
SusWrite 677
402% 1,802 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 80
264% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 719
DQ Mixed 891
651% 854 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 262%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
101GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 403 299 293 287 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 494
Mixed 367
SusWrite 342
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62
207% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100
451GB free
Firmware: M0CR050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 483 421 381 379 377 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 372
Mixed 257
SusWrite 415
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 27.8
122% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 207
172% 248 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 105%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 140 142 143 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 133
Write 128
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 142
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79%
Great: 97%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130
240GB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 96 98 98 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130
129GB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 85 84 88 88 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130
42GB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 90 91 90 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
153GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 76 78 79 83 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 50.8
Write 76.6
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 80.4
50% 67 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.4
188% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
252GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 108 109 111 113 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 105
Write 96.2
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 111
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 107%
SANDISK SDDR-489 64GB
41GB free, PID cfc9
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 80 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 90.6
Write 79.8
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 79.1
100% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback