| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | EVGA 132-BL-E758 (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110825 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 05 '19 at 14:17 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.6%
Very good
|
74% 123 Pts
|
49% 393 Pts
|
30% 480 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
EVGA(3842 5670) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.7%
Very poor
|
16% 20.6 fps
|
20% 24.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 231 233 233 231 227 MB/s
|
79%
Very good
|
55% 244 MB/s
|
147% 48.3 MB/s
|
136% 187 MB/s
|
|
Intel Raid 5 Volume 256GB
82GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 59 51 54 64 58 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
51% 236 MB/s
|
46% 13.3 MB/s
|
73% 133 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR2
|
60%
Above average
|
60% 21.1 GB/s
|
39% 13.8 GB/s
|
78% 51 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 132-BL-E758 Builds (Compare 144 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA 132-BL-E758
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 69x |
| Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 13x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
| GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)NvidiaBench 40%, 5,438 samples | 7x |
| GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $384 |