Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X58-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58-USB3  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 14:40
Run Duration398 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$84
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 95.1
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 159
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 384
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F9) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 4.4
3% 5 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4
Splatting 5
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 29 38 37 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 167
Write 159
Mixed 181
SusWrite 33.5
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 34.3
94% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 40.4
32% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 41%
Great: 125%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
55GB free
Firmware: 1.3.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 28 52 55 51 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 164
Write 69.8
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 44.7
20% 91 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 11.9
51% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 61.4
DQ Write 31.2
DQ Mixed 29.6
26% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 61%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
70GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 64 50 50 46 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
48% Average
Read 310
Write 108
Mixed 192
SusWrite 80.8
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 18.9
82% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 83.3
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 118
95% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 12.3
Mixed 17.3
36% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
133% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 107
Mixed 28.3
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
418GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 42 42 43 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 60.3
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 41.1
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 27%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 101
Write 106
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 109
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 23.6
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 15.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58-USB3 Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback