PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X58 Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111031 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 23 '22 at 17:20 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5690
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
67%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900LA5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 113 112 101 70 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$67
469GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 117 118 119 123 MB/s
|
59.3%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 31x |
Core i7 930Intel $145Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 26x |
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 8x |
GTX 980-TiNvidia $449Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $300 |