Today's hottest deals

Asrock X58 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X58 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 17:20
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 139
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 455
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 19
Parallax 18.8
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 18
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900LA5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 113 112 101 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 188
Write 139
Mixed 147
SusWrite 103
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 17.2
65% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 32.1
DQ Mixed 26.7
20% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 96%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$67
469GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 117 118 119 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 86.9
Write 107
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 118
62% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
378% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback