Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '19 at 10:16
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 230
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 707
68% 562 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
PwrHis(1787 A587) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.7% Good
Lighting 79.5
Reflection 79.3
Parallax 101
65% 86.5 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 62.7
59% 72.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2196
Write 1,713
Mixed 823
348% 1,577 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.8
200% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 749
557% 747 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
432GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 149 150 149 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 150
Write 161
Mixed 40
SusWrite 149
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 75%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
298GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 116 115 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 111
Write 72.2
Mixed 63
SusWrite 116
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 62%
Synology iSCSI Storage 495GB
348GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 96 99 96 97 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 100
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 95.9
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 35.4
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 28.7
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback