Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '19 at 13:16
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 88.2 1-Core 113 2-Core 229 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 712 72% 586 Pts	64-Core 984 61% 984 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 73.4 Parallax 65.3 61% 71 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 71 58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 53GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 308 307 307 283 270 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 461 Mixed 433 SusWrite 318 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 48.7 167% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 56 100 134 139 135 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 181 Write 156 Mixed 86.6 SusWrite 111 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43 15,932 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 6GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 74 81 85 85 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 77.3 Write 78.6 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 81.9 53% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 58%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 297GB free Firmware: 0002CE02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 71 71 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 70.3 Write 69.6 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 70.2 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 39%
Maxtor OneTouch II 300GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 279GB free, PID 7100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 17.3 Write 32.1 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 35.7 39% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.1 206% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
V-Color TL48G32S8SRGB16 2x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 45.2 MC Write 41.6 MC Mixed 36.3 117% 41 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 30.9 82% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $636

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)