TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory89.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 17:56
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 645
58% 492 Pts
64-Core 1,669
103% 1,669 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 71.9%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2661) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 34
20% 28.1 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 27
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 21.5%
 Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$95
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 402 409 402 400 399 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 411
Write 390
Mixed 355
SusWrite 403
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 30.2
113% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 84.1
DQ Write 96.4
DQ Mixed 0.5
25% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 79.9%
 Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
167GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 182 184 182 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 151
Mixed 84
SusWrite 182
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 135 143 153 151 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 109
Write 117
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 144
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.1
138% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 72.8%
 Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F E... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 46.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 30.4
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 90%
 Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples153x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel  $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples131x
GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples174x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples96x
SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples68x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples61x
RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples18x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback