Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 14:05
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 744
72% 591 Pts
64-Core 1,288
80% 1,288 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 39.3
48% 42.9 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 39.3
28% 33.4 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0705AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 80 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 443
Write 392
Mixed 375
SusWrite 87.7
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 35.2
119% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 251
212% 308 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 92%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
208GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 416 415 416 396 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 456
Mixed 337
SusWrite 393
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 42.8
142% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 361
274% 369 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
875GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 165 166 163 165 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 168
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 163
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 109%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 14
Mixed 5
SusWrite 14.3
16% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC M378A2K43CB1-CRC 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 13.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback