Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 09:25
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 289
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 761
85% 669 Pts
64-Core 809
50% 809 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 150
Parallax 127
113% 139 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 136
Splatting 112
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 179 163 115 127 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 476
Mixed 293
SusWrite 149
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 48.9
174% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 244
207% 304 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98%
Great: 111%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
378GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 90 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 89.3
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 177 175 177 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 163
Mixed 110
SusWrite 175
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC M378A2K43CB1-CRC 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 39.1
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 96%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback