bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '16 at 18:27
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 80
2-Core 154
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 364
40% 317 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Elitegroup(1019 1A0A) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.4200
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
8.19% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 4.03
9% 8.6 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 8.17
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.81 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.19%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd1600aa WD1600AACS-00ZWB 160GB
65GB free
Firmware: 03.03B.2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 108
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.43
103% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 64%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
54GB free
Firmware: AX002J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 60.5
Mixed 58.3
46% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.16
56% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPFOA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 70.2
Write 71.7
Mixed 60.8
51% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.37
77% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback