Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 148 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 411 40% 330 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700M 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 04A3) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	5.84% Terrible	Lighting 7.27 Reflection 7.23 Parallax 6.03 6% 6.84 fps	MRender 7.57 Gravity 5.57 Splatting 7.52 6% 6.89 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.84% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 396 408 429 434 428 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 404 Write 405 Mixed 350 SusWrite 416 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 34.5 109% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 247 208% 303 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB HMT325S6BFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT325S6BFR8C-PB 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.4% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17.6 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16