Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 161 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 408 43% 342 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700M 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 04A3) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 3.59 4% 4.31 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 5.91 4% 4.56 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 7%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 325GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 384 Write 373 Mixed 336 81% 365 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 30.7 93% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 364 270% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
SABRENT 500GB 1,200 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 40GB free Firmware: 0204 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,602 Write 25.7 Mixed 55.3 879% 1,228 MB/s	4K Read 345 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 4 14,875% 117 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB HMT325S6BFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT325S6BFR8C-PB 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.8% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 17.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 14.5 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16