Asus VANGUARD B85

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus VANGUARD B85  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 13:07
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$35
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 189
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 492
53% 423 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 65.9
56% 69.2 fps
MRender 74.6
Gravity 67
Splatting 61.3
55% 67.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300 128GB-$170
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 175 152 175 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80% Very good
Read 395
Write 295
Mixed 214
SusWrite 171
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 39.8
136% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 195
162% 235 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
273GB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 137 130 138 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 136
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 108%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
279GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 119 118 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 133
Write 131
Mixed 96
SusWrite 119
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 0622 DDR3-1600 CL10 8GB 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VANGUARD B85 Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus VANGUARD B85 - $7,816

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $7,994
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback