Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181004
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '19 at 16:31
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X 3,902 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 79.6 1-Core 130 2-Core 258 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 848 83% 679 Pts	64-Core 2,016 125% 2,016 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.16 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 86 57% 74.5 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 71 Splatting 55.6 52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 610GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 39 38 41 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 12GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 103 103 79 72 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 90 Write 90 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 93.4 58% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 66%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 44GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 128 Write 121 Mixed 93 SusWrite 101 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 11GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 93 92 92 93 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 89.5 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 91.3 68% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 59%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170 104 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: AV01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 128 128 128 128 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B0 640GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 3GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 74.8 Write 75.5 Mixed 55.7 87% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 39%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 63GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 4.1 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 91.5 Write 87 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 1.1 66% 54.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 43%
ST375064 0AS 750GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 143GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 48 66 66 70 67 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 50 Write 43 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 62.5 66% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 25%
WDC WD15 EARS-00S8B1 1.5TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 83GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 44 66 66 70 67 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 92 Write 98.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 61.8 91% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 17% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.6% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 14.3 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 15.1 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 127%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	56x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	28x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	29x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	14x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	11x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $81Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 8x8GBCorsairBench 113%, 87 samples	5x
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 89%, 5,810 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $1,880

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16