Asrock Z97E-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97E-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '19 at 15:13
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 429
46% 367 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 6.56
3% 5.73 fps
Splatting 7.65
8% 7.65 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
924GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001b31 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 815 765 879 848 859 852 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,653
Write 438
Mixed 732
SusWrite 836
202% 915 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 52.9
187% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 467
362% 486 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 197%
Great: 297%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 85 88 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 37.5
Write 77.7
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 89.5
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
174% 2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 63%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
659GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 109 109 117 112 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 181
Write 191
Mixed 92
SusWrite 111
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 142 149 148 152 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 153
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 148
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 170 180 182 184 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 168
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 180
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 164 157 159 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 156
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 152
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 108%
DAS TerraMaster 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 48 48 49 48 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 145
Write 139
Mixed 105
SusWrite 48.9
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 92%
DAS TerraMaster 4TB
453GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 44 48 46 46 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 73.7
Write 111
Mixed 109
SusWrite 46.7
64% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
280% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 92%
DAS TerraMaster 4TB
949GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 49 48 49 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 161
Write 167
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 47.7
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
401% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 92%
DAS TerraMaster 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 32 36 34 33 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 138
Write 41
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 34
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 106%
DAS TerraMaster 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 49 48 49 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 92%
ST3000VN 007-2AH16M 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 144 156 153 157 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
Read 28.7
Write 31.4
Mixed 20
SusWrite 153
87% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
ST3000DM 007-1WY10G 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 5.9 3.7 4.6 5 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Read 40.5
Write 96.6
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 5.1
64% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 61%
ST3000VN 007-2AH16M 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 140 154 151 154 156 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.4% Average
Read 58.2
Write 53.7
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 150
109% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
28% 0.37 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
891GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 0.7 0.9 1 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 18
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 0.9
17% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97E-ITX/ac - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $715
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback