Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 16:10
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 70
1-Core 119
2-Core 223
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 714
69% 567 Pts
64-Core 1,161
72% 1,161 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.9% Below average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 53.9
42% 55 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 26
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
666GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 435 440 447 409 402 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 420
Mixed 411
SusWrite 428
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 44.8
155% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 306
246% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
WDC WD50 00AAJS-22TKA0 500GB
466GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 54 62 62 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
Read 80
Write 80
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 57.1
91% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
118% 1.37 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB
296GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 54 62 62 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
Read 118
Write 66
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 56.9
94% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37%
Great: 42%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
912GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 51 2.1 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 112
SusWrite 26.7
141% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 59%
ST3000VN 007-2AH16M 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.8% Below average
Read 165
Write 140
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 7.5
123% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.9% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 23.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback