Today's hottest deals

MSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '19 at 06:13
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 122
57% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 309
34% 271 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 155 156 156 149 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 208
Write 164
Mixed 188
SusWrite 148
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 33.5
108% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 67.2
DQ Mixed 38.7
32% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
17GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 140 154 172 181 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 140
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 154
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
269GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 133
Write 100
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 114
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 17.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback