PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100429 |
Uptime | 6.9 Days |
Run Date | Dec 11 '19 at 15:12 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | SGP-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 760-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marvell Raid VD 0 511GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 77 186 195 88 61 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
421GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 93 93 92 93 MB/s
|
68.3%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 139x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 128x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 88x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 26x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |