Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06FW8P
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130528
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 13:00
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 154
56% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 593
53% 447 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 372B) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 31.5
31% 31.6 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 34
Splatting 32.7
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sata SSD 240GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 118
Write 102
Mixed 115
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 16
55% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 86.2
DQ Write 91.9
DQ Mixed 65.5
56% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
153GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 90 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 96
Write 79.9
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 86.9
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.5
195% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53%
Great: 88%
Toshiba HDWD130 2TB
15GB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 119 120 120 121 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 117
Write 115
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 116
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 81%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
907GB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 120 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 124
Write 121
Mixed 40
SusWrite 117
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
111GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 22.8
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 24.1
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 26.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback