HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	32.2 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '20 at 00:49
Run Duration	343 Seconds
Run User	SYC-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 64.7 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 177 62% 110 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 662 60% 505 Pts	64-Core 1,278 79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.8% Very good	Lighting 95.2 Reflection 99.5 Parallax 83.3 78% 92.6 fps	MRender 79.9 Gravity 86.6 Splatting 87.2 70% 84.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,666 Write 2,916 Mixed 2,779 624% 2,787 MB/s	4K Read 321 4K Write 264 4K Mixed 270 971% 285 MB/s	DQ Read 712 DQ Write 604 DQ Mixed 611 471% 643 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 84GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 230 224 217 223 227 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.1% Good	Read 229 Write 218 Mixed 204 SusWrite 224 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 34.8 110% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 195 146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 11GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 83 84 86 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 78.8 Write 55.8 Mixed 43.2 SusWrite 83.5 48% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 105%
WD WD60EZRZ-00G 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 113 113 113 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 111 Write 92.5 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 114 69% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 72%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 116 Write 108 Mixed 68.7 72% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 97%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 71GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.1 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 23.5 Write 21.8 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 6.3 24% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1 185% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 798GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.5 6.6 6.5 6 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.95% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 22 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 6.3 23% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 7.95% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 140GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.2 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 19.5 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 6.4 22% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 49%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 42GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.6 6.5 6 2.8 2.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 16.8 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 5.1 22% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer 32GB 3,296 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 9GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 7.7 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 7.7 11% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2 137% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 18%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 849GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.5 6 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.45% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 20.8 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 6.3 24% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.2 49% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 8.45% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 2TB 10,723 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 488GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.5 5.9 6.3 5.7 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 27 Write 17 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 6.1 20% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 130GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 18.6 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.1 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	319x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	88x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	68x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16