Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '16 at 22:22
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 181 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 352 47% 352 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 41.3 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 39 34% 37.7 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 38 31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1642 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 411 (B1) Unknown 98 98 90 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 48 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21764345565	106% Outstanding	Read 526 Write 497 Mixed 491 113% 504 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 35.8 125% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 145 168% 289 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 740GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 63 159591824 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1039 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 15853272 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3732 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1023 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 56 504627230 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1041 (C2) HDA temperature 30 16 68719476766 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 3 1 159591824 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -114130165952880 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9143607387 (F2) Unknown 100 253 5878071721	95.2% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 157 Mixed 151 121% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.31 95% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 112%
Sharkoon Rapidcase USB3 3TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 98.6 Write 102 Mixed 9.18 81% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 7.39 4K Mixed 0.55 272% 2.86 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 1,941 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.7 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	349x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	168x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	123x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	59x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	23x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	34x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16