Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 22:19
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 652
57% 486 Pts
64-Core 1,638
101% 1,638 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 112
Parallax 93.9
80% 102 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 95
Splatting 99.2
80% 97 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 430 200 76 69 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 454
Write 430
Mixed 368
SusWrite 213
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 36.7
117% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 259
216% 312 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
226GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65% Good
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 115
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65%
Great: 114%
ST2000DX 001-1NS164 2TB
95GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
Read 75.2
Write 69.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 72.4
81% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
252% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 80%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
64GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
Read 123
Write 118
Mixed 80
SusWrite 72.3
129% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
80GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.8% Very poor
Read 62
Write 71
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 0.1
61% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
405GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.2% Very poor
Read 80.8
Write 90
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 0.2
69% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 40%
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 0GB
0GB free, PID 5151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.5 2.6 3.4 3.8 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 2.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 3.4
8% 6.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 5%
WDC WD32 00AAJS-65RYA0 320GB
220GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 27 28 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.2% Poor
Read 80
Write 79
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 27.4
76% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
ST320005 42AS 2TB
309GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 95.2
Write 95
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 0
77% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 41%
HDS72252 5VLSA80 250GB
232GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 55 56 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.6% Poor
Read 57
Write 48
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 54.9
66% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 125
Write 132
Mixed 75
SusWrite 27.5
115% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 30.8
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.7
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $90
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback