| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3118-A1 |
| Memory | 28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130920 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 30 '20 at 09:50 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
|
61.7%
Good
|
55% 90.9 Pts
|
40% 324 Pts
|
57% 917 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FirePro W5000
AMD(1002 0B06) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
15% 21.7 fps
|
19% 21.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 144 163 153 156 153 MB/s
|
51.6%
Above average
|
47% 214 MB/s
|
82% 28.8 MB/s
|
28% 45.4 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
835GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 162 163 164 163 MB/s
|
92.5%
Outstanding
|
97% 133 MB/s
|
150% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4A 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28%
Poor
|
27% 9.5 GB/s
|
19% 6.6 GB/s
|
47% 85.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R920 Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 9x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples | 5x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |