Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime6 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '20 at 10:43
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 313
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,190
100% 865 Pts
64-Core 2,911
180% 2,911 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
MSI(1462 3605) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2927 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 30.3
26% 33.3 fps
MRender 46.2
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 42.2
33% 40.2 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2147 622 615 616 621 621 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,491
Write 2,348
Mixed 1,634
SusWrite 874
411% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 88.9
297% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,050
DQ Write 891
DQ Mixed 974
729% 972 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 289%
Great: 340%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$63
837GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2120 2115 2106 2115 1869 1067 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 2,594
Write 2,133
Mixed 1,529
SusWrite 1,898
457% 2,039 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 94.5
322% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,126
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 513
512% 829 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 363%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
926GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 456 456 457 456 455 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 448
Mixed 441
SusWrite 456
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 53.7
176% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
466GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 457 456 457 448 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 449
Mixed 449
SusWrite 429
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 53.6
179% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
2.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 132 148 148 150 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 185
Mixed 72
SusWrite 145
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
308% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 109%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$249
5.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 191 195 192 195 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 187
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 193
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.7
223% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 121%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$50
3TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 159 161 161 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 145
Write 125
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 160
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3733 C17 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 51.3
MC Write 45.9
MC Mixed 45.9
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 41.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $896
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback