PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (all builds) |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201201 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | Jan 03 '21 at 11:34 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 8711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 425 433 411 408 408 MB/s
|
115%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
172GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1153 2190 2361 2358 2366 2204 MB/s
|
372%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 129 122 125 122 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3733 C17 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
73.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 1,538x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 723x |
Core i9-9900KFIntel $294Bench 98%, 50,265 samples | 197x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 552x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 221x |
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples | 201x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $1,413 |