Asrock FM2A88X Extreme6+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme6+  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '20 at 10:42
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 66
2-Core 124
53% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 200
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 9.75
7% 8.63 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 8
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex TURBO 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 17 15 10 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22% Poor
Read 56.1
Write 43.6
Mixed 31
SusWrite 18.1
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 2.7
490% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 34%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
42GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 47 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 44.2
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 45.6
32% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 51%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
302GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 77 78 79 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 139
Write 149
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 78.5
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 97%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
7GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 76 51 74 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40% Average
Read 65.4
Write 57.7
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 73.7
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 OCZ3G1333LV2G CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.1% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 12.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme6+ Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme6+ - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback