Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime25.2 Days
Run DateJan 09 '17 at 20:54
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$151
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 346
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2827) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 52.5
37% 46.1 fps
MRender 54.4
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 37.6
38% 47.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
404GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 95.1
Write 72.7
Mixed 86
64% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.43
112% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
228GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 84
Write 70.1
Mixed 77.3
58% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.23
66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 52%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
125GB free
Firmware: 3.CHF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 53.3
Mixed 62.3
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.35
92% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSX 500GB
383GB free, PID 0571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 30
Write 25.1
Mixed 3.66
22% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.15
17% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 15.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback