Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DA7/E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DA7/E  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DA7/E
Memory250.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 15:58
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 722
64% 545 Pts
64-Core 1,808
112% 1,808 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 5180) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 143
Parallax 122
107% 132 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 126
Splatting 105
93% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 383 399 386 377 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 455
Mixed 380
SusWrite 388
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 41.9
135% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
664GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 433 440 435 435 435 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 450
Mixed 414
SusWrite 428
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 43.8
142% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 358
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1574 1409 1409 1412 1410 1410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,814
Write 1,728
Mixed 1,572
SusWrite 1,437
369% 1,638 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 44.1
151% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 463
342% 456 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 227%
Great: 335%
Zotac Sonix NVMe PCIe 480GB-$797
443GB free
Firmware: E7FM01.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 855 860 845 760 833 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 957
Write 1304
Mixed 705
SusWrite 820
214% 947 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 33.3
117% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 569
DQ Mixed 28.9
189% 439 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 153%
Great: 244%
WD Se 4TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 149 149 150 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 162
Mixed 90
SusWrite 149
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 100%
WD WD5001F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 118 119 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 122
Write 113
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 119
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST16000VN001-2RV103 16TB
7TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 253 253 248 246 248 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 32.8
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.3
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DA7/E Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DA7/E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback