Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro X9DA7/E

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Supermicro X9DA7/E (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DA7/E
Memory	249.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181002
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '20 at 09:45
Run Duration	332 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0 1,646 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 68.4 1-Core 96.7 2-Core 188 66% 118 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 723 65% 546 Pts	64-Core 1,802 112% 1,802 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 155 Reflection 143 Parallax 147 127% 149 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 127 Splatting 103 108% 136 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 357GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 437 438 430 415 377 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 458 Mixed 379 SusWrite 414 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 42.4 145% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 356 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 752GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 442 443 434 419 419 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 456 Mixed 423 SusWrite 424 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 43.5 148% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 353 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$150 6,712 User benchmarks, average bench 262% 1.5TB free Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1659 1414 1409 1412 1412 1413 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,809 Write 1,738 Mixed 1,565 SusWrite 1453 369% 1,641 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 95.4 4K Mixed 56.4 167% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 545 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 458 338% 450 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 335%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 510GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 469GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 571 569 569 568 566 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 115%
WD WD5001F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 165 165 165 165 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 132 Write 202 Mixed 83.8 SusWrite 166 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1 357% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 125%
WD Re 2TB-$30 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 137 136 136 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 140 Write 136 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 136 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 83%
Seagate ST16000VN001-2RV103 16TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 6.5TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 227 227 231 232 237 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 138%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 16x16GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 16 of 16 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	132% Outstanding	MC Read 64.2 MC Write 49.4 MC Mixed 54.6 160% 56.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.4 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DA7/E Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DA7/E

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	3x

GPU
NVS 510NvidiaBench 3%, 2,450 samples	3x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	2x

SSD
530 Series 240GBIntel $149Bench 76%, 16,872 samples	2x
850 Pro 128GBSamsung $58Bench 99%, 18,195 samples	2x
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples	1x

RAM
9965516-165.A 8x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 3 samples	3x
M393B1G70QH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 183 samples	2x
18JSF1G72PDZ- 4x8GBMicronBench 86%, 7 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 7% - Terrible

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350