Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '17 at 21:16
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 142
59% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 565
49% 416 Pts
64-Core 1300
80% 1300 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 3.41
4% 3.98 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.34 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,042
Write 1,406
Mixed 1,385
357% 1,611 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 36.1
127% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 37.4
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 23.8
48% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 212%
Great: 283%
Toshiba HDWJ110 1TB
8GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 52
Write 52.3
Mixed 50.5
39% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30%
Great: 63%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
4GB free
Firmware: AX101U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 84.4
Write 63.8
Mixed 56.7
51% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.19
61% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 62%
Samsung Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 10.5
Mixed 11.6
20% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.33
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.55
61% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 23.5
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $705
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback